EVALUATION: PRESENTATION Michael Thomas Student (s): Presentation title or subject Dimensions of Evaluation (4 - very well done, no problems, 3 - flawed in minor ways, 2 - flawed in numerous minor ways or one major way, 1- flawed in more than one major way, 0 - pervasive flaws seriously undermine the presentation). Content: 1) Enthusiasm, involvement (2 pts.) Score = pts. 2) Explicit connection to seminar issues (2pts) Score = pts 3) Thoroughness/level of analysis (4pts) Score = pts 4) Insight, thoughtfulness (3pts) Score = pts Presentation 5) Structure, internal integration, pace (2pts) Score = pts 6) Poise/Connection to audience (2pts) Score = pts Overall, in Sum: (2/3 weight) Peer/Audience Assessment: (1/3 weight) Points awarded (15 possible) Narrative Response:
Michael Thomas
Student (s):
Presentation title or subject
Dimensions of Evaluation (4 - very well done, no problems, 3 - flawed in minor ways, 2 - flawed in numerous minor ways or one major way, 1- flawed in more than one major way, 0 - pervasive flaws seriously undermine the presentation).
Content:
1) Enthusiasm, involvement (2 pts.) Score = pts.
2) Explicit connection to seminar issues (2pts) Score = pts
3) Thoroughness/level of analysis (4pts) Score = pts
4) Insight, thoughtfulness (3pts) Score = pts
Presentation
5) Structure, internal integration, pace (2pts) Score = pts
6) Poise/Connection to audience (2pts) Score = pts
Overall, in Sum: (2/3 weight)
Peer/Audience Assessment: (1/3 weight)
Points awarded (15 possible)
Narrative Response: